RE: Will Jesus return on a white horse?
January 17, 2013 at 1:23 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2013 at 1:23 am by Cyberman.)
(January 17, 2013 at 1:11 am)Rhythm Wrote: You could, without assigning any given thing a positive moral value, call it a "moral act", and then, once it's been established or agreed upon (ideally) that morality applies to this act....you could go on the make a case for a negative moral value judgement, in essence call the act "immoral". You would not be contradicting yourself, no dishonesty (intellectual or otherwise) or delusion would be required......
Just as you could say someone has incredible luck, without specifying whether that's "good" luck or "bad" luck. As we're constantly being reminded, context is key.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
