(January 18, 2013 at 1:16 am)Surtr Wrote:(January 18, 2013 at 12:35 am)catfish Wrote: It's circular logic to take an expression from the Bible and then post a definition that uses an example from the Bible. Don't you think?
.
You cannot seriously be this stupid. Please. Tell me you're joking.
They didn't even use examples from the bible, they used religious examples to illustrate the meaning of the word more effectively. I defined the word like you asked me to, and you accuse me of using circular logic.
LOL! You can't seriously be that stupid, yet you obviously are...
They didn't use examples from the Bible yet they used religious examples??? Where the fuck did those "religious" examples come from then?
(January 18, 2013 at 1:16 am)Surtr Wrote:(January 18, 2013 at 12:35 am)catfish Wrote: Perhaps you should look up what an eon is...
It doesn't matter. That's not the correct definition.
LOL again! Holy fuck man, what kind of stupid cunt are you exactly?
If eonian is derived from eon, then the definition of eon is key to determining what eonian means...
(January 18, 2013 at 1:16 am)Surtr Wrote:Surtr Wrote:Let me clear something up for you: There is no indication in the bible of where those souls would go if Hell was temporary, and when they are brought back in Revelations, they are cast back into the "lake of fire" after being judged again.
I will give you ONE more chance to refute this. Run away again, or answer me.
Irrelevant in regards to the definition of eonian.
.
