(January 18, 2013 at 9:35 pm)catfish Wrote: LOL!
Someone hasn't been following closely enough to have any pertinent info to add...
.
Catfish! Please supply evidence as to why we should give your definition of the word "eternal" more credence than its alternate meaning, other than just the fact that you said it. Otherwise, your claim has no credibility, and can be safely ignored in favor of using the secondary definition, which Surtr did provide evidence for.
This is how argumentation works, sir. Your claim isn't valid just because you made it.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!