RE: Jesus, Least Fit Moral Judge
January 18, 2013 at 9:49 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2013 at 9:50 pm by catfish.)
(January 18, 2013 at 9:40 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(January 18, 2013 at 9:35 pm)catfish Wrote: LOL!
Someone hasn't been following closely enough to have any pertinent info to add...
.
Catfish! Please supply evidence as to why we should give your definition of the word "eternal" more credence than its alternate meaning, other than just the fact that you said it. Otherwise, your claim has no credibility, and can be safely ignored in favor of using the secondary definition, which Surtr did provide evidence for.
This is how argumentation works, sir. Your claim isn't valid just because you made it.
Surtr provided the evidence. It's up to you to decide if "eternal" is the correct translation of aeonian.
Please don't use circular reason like he did. If your definition uses an example from the Bible, then you're using the Bible to support the Biblical translation.
.
