Jesus, Least Fit Moral Judge

[Violet]

Please explain how "all" is subject to context...

This should be entertaining...

All things are subjective, innately possessing context by which they are then summed, judged, and systematically ignored.

That which should be entertaining is a lot less of a hook to me than that which is guaranteed to incite chortling: someone making an argument that includes the word 'objective' or any number of its forms (vly, vizing, er).

Now that's some good stuff ^_^

---

If you do not understand how language works, there's nothing I can do to help you.

Do you understand how language works? I might be able to help you with that...

But then, despite my incredibly adventurous English vocabulary, and my quaintly creative sentence structure (or intentional omissions of proper prose): I am a terrible communicator.

Half the time, someone will think I'm insulting them; the other half openly mocking them; AND THE REST JUST THINK I'M PLAIN CRAZY, and perhaps more than a little silly.

I'm really quite the charmer (it's true as God is true!) Infact, twithout such... who would I be?



'After all, what would the world be like without Captain James Hook?'

PS: don't let the original question become burred 'neath harmless harangue. More pointedly: can you tell us how English works?