Your number 4 is misleading and you are making yourself look like a Poe. No atheist says that atheism is not a position or lack of a position. They say it is lack of belief. Your argument has to do with position, and it really looks like you placed that word there simply so you could argue it. A little silly, in my opinion. It is a lack of belief, which is not the same as disbelief. From the free dictionary, disbelief is "Refusal or reluctance to believe" Try again.
Number 5 is stupid too. When people question the validity of perception and reasoning by capable people, they are being intellectually dishonest. It is misuse of philosophical concepts like existence in order to hold on to a ridiculous notion that atheists must work by faith. I have faith in a lot of things. I don't have fucking faith in a god that does not exist. So, number five is irrelevant, inaccurate and supportive of an extremely annoying habit of using pseudo-logic to debate.
Number 5 is stupid too. When people question the validity of perception and reasoning by capable people, they are being intellectually dishonest. It is misuse of philosophical concepts like existence in order to hold on to a ridiculous notion that atheists must work by faith. I have faith in a lot of things. I don't have fucking faith in a god that does not exist. So, number five is irrelevant, inaccurate and supportive of an extremely annoying habit of using pseudo-logic to debate.
