(January 24, 2013 at 10:17 am)jonb Wrote: Now, shall we get back to the Oxfam report?No, you're continually avoiding my question. You have been avoiding it for many pages now. You can't just accuse me of making up an association with your use of the word "tax" and government tax, and then refuse to explain which definition of the word "tax" you were using.
If I'm misinterpreting your words, why not explain what they actually meant? The only reason I can think of is that you've realized that you were in the wrong, and for whatever reason you don't want to admit it. Luckily for me, your words are there in your post, and anyone can read this thread to see that you've dodged my question whilst continually accusing me of being in the wrong. The difference is, when I'm accused of being wrong, I either admit it or refute my accuser.