So, you think that a 25% government tax involving the exchange of monies, not some tiresome abstract, should be imposed on the top 100 wealthiest people so as to end poverty? That is what it says there, yet you went on to tell Tiberius that it is not what you meant. You also went on to blather on about the other meanings of taxing, committing the fallacy of equivocation repeatedly. Now, with all of that being said. Quite plainly, you meant a monetary tax on these people, yes?
You sir have been lying and slinking around for pages. You should be ashamed of yourself, seriously. You could have admitted what you meant or defended your original position like an adult. Instead, you bullshitted. For shame.
You sir have been lying and slinking around for pages. You should be ashamed of yourself, seriously. You could have admitted what you meant or defended your original position like an adult. Instead, you bullshitted. For shame.
