You need faith to believe in evidence?
Faith is believing without evidence, so you are saying that belief without evidence is required to believe in evidence? Well, no...because, by definition when you believe in evidence you don't have faith in it.
How are you defining faith? If it's trust in evidence, it's not faith. Because faith lacks basis, it is taking something "on faith", it is irrational, it lacks evidence.
Blink of faith? Give me an example.
If you believe in evidence and you are let down, then the evidence was wrong so you actually had faith, not belief in evidence - because it turns out it was not evidence! Because if evidence turns out to be wrong then how was it ever evidence in the first place? You merely thought it was.
EvF
Faith is believing without evidence, so you are saying that belief without evidence is required to believe in evidence? Well, no...because, by definition when you believe in evidence you don't have faith in it.
How are you defining faith? If it's trust in evidence, it's not faith. Because faith lacks basis, it is taking something "on faith", it is irrational, it lacks evidence.
Blink of faith? Give me an example.
If you believe in evidence and you are let down, then the evidence was wrong so you actually had faith, not belief in evidence - because it turns out it was not evidence! Because if evidence turns out to be wrong then how was it ever evidence in the first place? You merely thought it was.
EvF
