If you have faith, then there can't be any evidence or it wouldn't be faith.
If there's evidence, then you don't need faith, or you wouldn't have evidence.
If well justified faith has evidence then since it has evidence, it's not faith. Trust in evidence is not faith, it's rational trust. Faith is irrational trust since it lacks evidence.
To do an analogy:
Any trust does not="Faith", which more specifically, lacks evidence and (almost certainly) cannot be rational. Just as any Will does not="Free Will", which, more specifically would require the Will to control itself when it is what does the controlling.
Because it seems as though you are equating trust as always being faith, just as it seems you equate all "choices" as being "free choices". Yes all faith is trust - but not all trust is faith. Yes all "free choices" are free - but not all choices are "Free" (I, for one, don't believe any of them are, but that's another matter).
EvF
If there's evidence, then you don't need faith, or you wouldn't have evidence.
If well justified faith has evidence then since it has evidence, it's not faith. Trust in evidence is not faith, it's rational trust. Faith is irrational trust since it lacks evidence.
To do an analogy:
Any trust does not="Faith", which more specifically, lacks evidence and (almost certainly) cannot be rational. Just as any Will does not="Free Will", which, more specifically would require the Will to control itself when it is what does the controlling.
Because it seems as though you are equating trust as always being faith, just as it seems you equate all "choices" as being "free choices". Yes all faith is trust - but not all trust is faith. Yes all "free choices" are free - but not all choices are "Free" (I, for one, don't believe any of them are, but that's another matter).
EvF
