(October 31, 2009 at 8:56 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I was just referring to homosexuality though, not specifically promiscuous homosexuality.
Unless you are saying that God considers that ALL homosexuality should be repressed, but only heterosexuality should be repressed if it's promiscuous? In which case, don't you think that's kind of unjust?
EvF
The bible refers to promiscuous homosexuality, and elsewhere also says the same about heterosexual promiscuity. The ruling is the same for both.
(November 1, 2009 at 8:35 am)Craveman Wrote: @ Frodo: With all these nagging questions and confusion going on, how can you claim that Christianity is perfect (referring to your signature)? Surely if Christianity was perfect then it would be plain and simple for all to understand and won't leave people confused.
To be in opposition puts you in the camp of incredulity. ie _you_ have the confusion, I don't. When it comes to working out issues that aren't well defined like this one (because it isn't clear) then I'm happy to do that. You think Christianity's non stance on this is a weakness, I don't.
(November 1, 2009 at 9:52 am)Nicky Wrote: So true. I found it funny how on Question Time, Nick Griffin describes Islam as a viscious faith due to it saying in the Koran that 'a women victim of rape should be stoned to death for adultery' etc., yet he wants the country to run on Chritian values, which, if this is anything to go by, are as equally viscious.
An outrageous comment totally unfounded.