Christ's birthday

[Violet]

The cartoon of yours concluded that the rock shape was designed because:

I do not take any credit whatsoever for that level of genius work ^_^

Very simply, it is because rocks with that shape, and that arrangement do not occur naturally, and we have no natural mechanism for their arrangement other than chance."

Such an argument would not work for something like signals from aliens or alien flying machines because maybe they do just occur in nature and we don't know it yet.

Ahhh! I thought that was the point you were addressing: how do we define 'natural', 'designed', 'complex', or anything else that matters in this instance?

I actually agree with the bold. I linked the comic as a presentation of why the watchmaker argument was a fallacy (It presumes that because A is 'true'... B must also be 'true'). 'Who put those rocks there?' is pretty funny imo ^_^ (even if it was a faulty question)... so i see no reason to dwell on it
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Edit: (Just noticed the end of post # 173)

Do you always answer for everyone here? Why do you not let Craveman answer for himself?

I answer for others only when I am quite sure my answer will be similar to theirs. Also, Craveman can easily answer for himself: there is nothing in the way of that. Why wait for an answer from person A, when person B understood exactly what A was saying... and can answer instead?

Please explain further as I do not follow you.

In example... follow every law in leviticus You would lead one 'messed up' life