RE: Question for atheists...
February 19, 2013 at 4:16 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2013 at 4:20 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 19, 2013 at 2:15 pm)BeeDeePee Wrote: I'm using the term "logical positivism" in a right way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism
I've never said that they thought Bible can help us to understand and explain natural mechanisms. They just rejected the claim that all metaphysical claims are meaningless because they are not proven.
Priceless.
Claims to be using the term logical positivism properly... Gives an improper definition of logical positivism in the very next sentence...
Says that metaphysical claims from the past have been proven... Gives examples of non-metaphysical claims...
Claims to think for himself.... Presents the same arguments you've heard from a billion other theists....
Titles a thread "Question for atheists".... Uses it as a stalking horse to give you the theist's answer...
*sigh* Another day, another liar for God...
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)