RE: Women. You have men by the balls.(...)
February 25, 2013 at 1:12 pm
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2013 at 1:18 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You maintain your position on the relative difference between males and females, I maintain mine. Regardless of who is correct it will not be support for your statement, unless you can demonstrate that a change in said loci has an effect on the relative level of oppression or subservience. If the difference were greater it would be that much easier to demonstrate the veracity of this claim. Damned if you do, damned if you don't - because you didn't think it through before you chose to get loose at the fingertips. What is so difficult to understand about this?
I'd say it's harder for a fat man to catch a skinny female to beat her in the first place. I'm not the one that focused on these attributes or brought them up in support of an ignorant statement, you did that. So I'm not exactly going to feel beholden to you to simply ignore them now when you clearly realize there's no traction in them.
But hell, we're on to weight. Show me the loci for weight (already touched on this) and how relative weight has a direct effect on levels of oppression or submissiveness. It's the same situation with height all over again and you'll fail here as hard as you failed there. Are you going to claim next that I'm being disingenuous when I focus on weight?
Should we instead retreat to strength? We're at least 1/3 of the way to your total abandonment of the support you have offered for your own dismal statement and I'm wondering why we don't just cut out all the foreplay and go straight to the money-shot.
I'd say it's harder for a fat man to catch a skinny female to beat her in the first place. I'm not the one that focused on these attributes or brought them up in support of an ignorant statement, you did that. So I'm not exactly going to feel beholden to you to simply ignore them now when you clearly realize there's no traction in them.
But hell, we're on to weight. Show me the loci for weight (already touched on this) and how relative weight has a direct effect on levels of oppression or submissiveness. It's the same situation with height all over again and you'll fail here as hard as you failed there. Are you going to claim next that I'm being disingenuous when I focus on weight?
Should we instead retreat to strength? We're at least 1/3 of the way to your total abandonment of the support you have offered for your own dismal statement and I'm wondering why we don't just cut out all the foreplay and go straight to the money-shot.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!