Where is the evidence whatsoever, supporting Pascal's wager in order to give it any actual merit?
In other words: Where is the actual evidence that atheists are more likely to go to hell or get any less benefits after death than Christians do? And where is the evidence that Christians are any more likely to go to heaven, or get any more benefits than Atheists do?
Well, the bible says it. But does that make it so? The bible is true because the bible is true because the bible is true? Is that, fallacious circular reasoning good enough? I think not. And if not, what on earth have you got to go by when using the pathetic argument that is 'Pascal's wager'.
EvF
In other words: Where is the actual evidence that atheists are more likely to go to hell or get any less benefits after death than Christians do? And where is the evidence that Christians are any more likely to go to heaven, or get any more benefits than Atheists do?
Well, the bible says it. But does that make it so? The bible is true because the bible is true because the bible is true? Is that, fallacious circular reasoning good enough? I think not. And if not, what on earth have you got to go by when using the pathetic argument that is 'Pascal's wager'.
EvF
