(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: 1. Exactly. So why do you say that they're impressionable by pornography automatically if it hasn't been tested?
I don't, and you fail to see that. But there only need to be a few kids that are. You are assuming the best, but lawmakers have to err on the side of caution.
(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: 2. Considering I'm 14, and only a year off from 13, I know how impressionable they are at that age. I have seriously perverted friends; it's not like I go around smacking people's asses and ejaculate all over their faces. None of my friends do anything rudely sexual, either... A
That is an argument from ignorance. You don't know anyone that does X so X will not happen. Ever hear of rainbow parties? Breezer-sluts? They are a genuine phenomenon under teens in the Netherlands.
(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: Also, you're being extremely stereotypical...
You have no idea what I am. You asked why lawmakers do not allow to sell porn to minors and I answered. If you don't like the answer then don't ask the question.
(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: I don't care what sort of social group I'm in. Nor do my friends, or my enemies, or acquaintances... And that right there is about 100 of 1300 students in my school.
See above.
(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: 3. Watching porn is far better than imagining porn... Let's face it, today's preteens and teens don't have imagination anymore...
Hardly an argument to cancel a law over.
(November 11, 2009 at 5:56 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: 4. ... I did not know that...
Why would you?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
