RE: An original argument against creationism
March 7, 2013 at 4:57 am
(This post was last modified: March 7, 2013 at 5:00 am by genkaus.)
(March 7, 2013 at 4:44 am)coolbeaners Wrote: So could social eugenics be an axiom of evolution?
No. An axiom is a premise from which reasoning begins and leads to a particular conclusion. Ideally, it is a premise so self-evident that it can be accepted without question. Social eugenics is not a self-evident proposition. You cannot reason to evolution (which is a natural and biological phenomena) from social eugenics. And finally, the very proposition of social eugenics requires evolution to be true in the first place. An axiom cannot presume the truth of its conclusion at the onset much less depend upon it so completely as is the case here.
(March 7, 2013 at 4:54 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: It's clear that air has a necessity and function,
No, it's not.
(March 7, 2013 at 4:54 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: leaving me with a natural assumption that the universe has a necessity and function
That wouldn't be the case even if air did have necessity and function.
