http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Platypus
All you ever needed to know about them
(Actual) fact 2: It makes less sense, because 'God' is a part of it... and it ignores all of the evidence and proof that it actually did not happen that way. After all... the sun could 'REALLY?' orbit the Earth... except for the FACT that it has been proven that it doesn't.
All you ever needed to know about them
rjh4 Wrote:According to Biblical creation, God created the animals after their "kind". Now it cannot be said exactly what the original "kinds" were. But it sure makes sense to me that given two animals that are of say the "dog kind" which have a lot of potential diversity built into the DNA thereof, all the types of dogs we observe today could certainly have been produced. So if your question is could all things that we call dogs have come from two original dogs, I think the answer is yes. Could all the cats we see today have come from two original cats? Yes. Could all the humans we see today have come from two original humans? Yes. So why does this make less sense than to say that we all come from some original organism? Why is this inconsistent with what we actually observe?'fact' 1: God created animals after their kind. Meaning: He didn't design the animals himself, because their archetype already existed.
(Actual) fact 2: It makes less sense, because 'God' is a part of it... and it ignores all of the evidence and proof that it actually did not happen that way. After all... the sun could 'REALLY?' orbit the Earth... except for the FACT that it has been proven that it doesn't.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
