So.. as looking Greydon's stuff on youtube I found his interview and started to look some more from Randi and Aaron Ra.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI0hViXjVz0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWyX3nWHrFU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF8AbSFmHnQ
So basically questions that this Hovind is asking are following:
1. Is it impossible to God to exists?
-That seems weird question kind of. I guess I would say no, since I'm agnostic-atheist, but phrasing seems quite weird.
2. If I could prove to your satisfaction the God of the bible, would you worship him?
-Kind of weird when you think about it. I mean I would say no, because I don't think God of the bible is moral or just. But wasn't like one attribute that was given to God in bible that it's ultimately moral or something like that?
3. As a christian my position is that without God you can't know anything, is it possible that you don't know anything/would you say we can know things?
4. Is it possible that our knowledge could be wrong?
5. Can something that we don't know prove wrong what we know?
6. How you know that you reasoning is valid?
-These ones I'm having most trouble with. Because I honestly have no good answer to this or how I should handle these kind of questions.
So I would like to hear how you guys would response to those and really surely someone there who have very good understanding of this type of stuff could form like "This is how you should response".
Because I'm pretty sure there is something tricky there, but I can't wrap my head around it. So how logic applies to these questions?
And of course it would be nice to hear what you think about responses, who did well and so on.
So about 1 and 2 why they seem so weird or is it just me?
3-6 how to answer?
I think Aaron Ra handled it best way, but then with Randi it gone pretty far to these kind of weird questions. Please help and teach me, thanks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI0hViXjVz0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWyX3nWHrFU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF8AbSFmHnQ
So basically questions that this Hovind is asking are following:
1. Is it impossible to God to exists?
-That seems weird question kind of. I guess I would say no, since I'm agnostic-atheist, but phrasing seems quite weird.
2. If I could prove to your satisfaction the God of the bible, would you worship him?
-Kind of weird when you think about it. I mean I would say no, because I don't think God of the bible is moral or just. But wasn't like one attribute that was given to God in bible that it's ultimately moral or something like that?
3. As a christian my position is that without God you can't know anything, is it possible that you don't know anything/would you say we can know things?
4. Is it possible that our knowledge could be wrong?
5. Can something that we don't know prove wrong what we know?
6. How you know that you reasoning is valid?
-These ones I'm having most trouble with. Because I honestly have no good answer to this or how I should handle these kind of questions.
So I would like to hear how you guys would response to those and really surely someone there who have very good understanding of this type of stuff could form like "This is how you should response".
Because I'm pretty sure there is something tricky there, but I can't wrap my head around it. So how logic applies to these questions?
And of course it would be nice to hear what you think about responses, who did well and so on.
So about 1 and 2 why they seem so weird or is it just me?
3-6 how to answer?
I think Aaron Ra handled it best way, but then with Randi it gone pretty far to these kind of weird questions. Please help and teach me, thanks!
