(March 12, 2013 at 1:10 am)catfish Wrote: I don't have to "justify" anything.
You do if you want anyone to legislate against it.
(March 12, 2013 at 1:10 am)catfish Wrote: I had to show that you claiming the moral highground against the selection of sex was weird and illogical...
Something you haven't even addressed beyond repeatedly saying "that's messed up".
(March 12, 2013 at 1:10 am)catfish Wrote: 1. You refuse to acknowledge the individuality of a fetus or zygote.
No, I acknowledge that it has individual DNA. But that doesn't make it an individual human.
(March 12, 2013 at 1:10 am)catfish Wrote: 2. Someone in this thread actually supported abortion up to the momemnt of birth.
And...
(March 12, 2013 at 1:10 am)catfish Wrote: 3. You equate a fetus as being no more important than a hair.
4. You don't object to hair selection by color.
5. By your logic, a woman could abort based on color, but not sex.
By my logic, a woman could abort on basis of color or sex. Its up to her. But if the basis of her choice is immoral, then her choice is immoral.
