RE: Science and religion
March 18, 2013 at 11:24 pm
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2013 at 11:25 pm by jstrodel.)
(March 18, 2013 at 10:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(March 18, 2013 at 9:58 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Why? Saying something is "unscientific" implies that science has disproved it. There is no science anywhere not one journal not one paper no experiment nothing anywhere that you can point to anywhere that disproves the existence of miracles.
Yeah, actually, there's a mountain of it.
Prove me wrong.
Here is John Lennox, a man with I think has 3 PhD's who teaches at Oxford talking about science and miracles.
I am not sure if some sort of amalgamation of all the studies that have been done on miracles exists. But science has not proved miracles to be false, in fact there have been many recent books by scientists and medical professionals about near death experiences.
You are saying that some study of a particular miracle failed to bear the intended fruit. That does not disprove the existence of miracles. A lot of miracles revolves around who is doing them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm5JXJGFw2k