@jatrodel
"1. A human experience of morality is observed.
2. God is seen to be the best or only explanation for this moral experience.
3. Therefore, God exists."
This is not a logical argument. You understand that right? Your argument is intended to show that God actually exists. Your second premise cannot assume the conclusion and certainly can't be an opinion!. Watch how this example also begs the question:
A human experience of Christmas exists.
Santa Claus is seen to be the best or only explanation for this experience.
Santa Claus exists.
This is a failed syllogism fraught with logical errors.
"1. A human experience of morality is observed.
2. God is seen to be the best or only explanation for this moral experience.
3. Therefore, God exists."
This is not a logical argument. You understand that right? Your argument is intended to show that God actually exists. Your second premise cannot assume the conclusion and certainly can't be an opinion!. Watch how this example also begs the question:
A human experience of Christmas exists.
Santa Claus is seen to be the best or only explanation for this experience.
Santa Claus exists.
This is a failed syllogism fraught with logical errors.