I don't think that Dawkins is a particularly brilliant debater, but when you judge a debate that isn't the way that you measure it anyway. You have to take percentages both before and after. Normally peoples minds change very little from watching a single debate. In that article it says nothing about what percentage of people agreed beforehand, so the number itself is fairly worthless.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)