RE: Science and religion
March 24, 2013 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2013 at 7:38 pm by jstrodel.)
Darkstar, you used the word "demostratably", but you don't ever demostrate your conclusions. Every one of your posts that I have seen has argued from authority. Just admit it, your faith is in science. You use science and logical words, but that is not how you build your belief system. Your knowledge of science comes from reading popular level books, not from doing science.
You relationship between "science" and "religion" uses categories that lump all religions together. Why would you do that? Because you don't have any knowledge of any particular religion. That is a common atheist tactic, to make all religious claims equally probably. But Christian theism has hundreds of years of rigorous peer reviewed publications in many, many languages, and scores of people with very high IQ's that have poured over the coherence of theism. Many theistic claims have been confirmed by modern science.
You relationship between "science" and "religion" uses categories that lump all religions together. Why would you do that? Because you don't have any knowledge of any particular religion. That is a common atheist tactic, to make all religious claims equally probably. But Christian theism has hundreds of years of rigorous peer reviewed publications in many, many languages, and scores of people with very high IQ's that have poured over the coherence of theism. Many theistic claims have been confirmed by modern science.