I agree all evidence points to morality being subjective. The more we reason about it, the more it seems that way as well.
There is two separate things: objective good will, objective good judgement.
When we talk about an objective perfect judgement, I don't believe it's possible or not possible as far as humanity goes. I am agnostic towards the issue. Perhaps one day it will be. However, I feel there is objectively good judgements, and that is when a person judges in a reasonably fair manner towards a decision with objective good will behind it. And as far as "good will", there is infinite possibilities as far as logical possibilities go, it's another thing if it corresponds to reality. (ie. perhaps there is only a finite range because perhaps there is no soul).
At the end, I believe in objective morality and objective good will, and also a supernatural force, despite the evidence, being that it is subjective (and there is even more so evidence from naturalism perspective). I wish however I was certain which I am not.
There is two separate things: objective good will, objective good judgement.
When we talk about an objective perfect judgement, I don't believe it's possible or not possible as far as humanity goes. I am agnostic towards the issue. Perhaps one day it will be. However, I feel there is objectively good judgements, and that is when a person judges in a reasonably fair manner towards a decision with objective good will behind it. And as far as "good will", there is infinite possibilities as far as logical possibilities go, it's another thing if it corresponds to reality. (ie. perhaps there is only a finite range because perhaps there is no soul).
At the end, I believe in objective morality and objective good will, and also a supernatural force, despite the evidence, being that it is subjective (and there is even more so evidence from naturalism perspective). I wish however I was certain which I am not.
