RE: Christ's birthday
November 22, 2009 at 4:34 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2009 at 4:35 pm by Ace Otana.)
(November 22, 2009 at 11:13 am)chatpilot Wrote: The god hypothesis in my view is unprovable in the natural world. The fact that it requires faith which in itself is an unscientific and unreasonable concept puts it out of the reach of mankind to know god through any other way.
Funny that isn't it. Faith only and nothing else.
You can apply faith to every imaginable character and you'd get the same results.
You can apply faith to santa or the tooth fairy. What's the differance? That is why evidence is so vital.
God probably doesn't exist. It's the only reasonable explanation to why there is no evidence of him.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
