RE: Formally Disproving Divine Command Theory
April 3, 2013 at 12:29 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2013 at 12:31 pm by FallentoReason.)
(April 3, 2013 at 12:11 pm)John V Wrote: It hasn't been shown that DCT requires absolutes.
So you're opting for objective morality that is subject to change? Cake comes to mind for some reason..
(April 3, 2013 at 12:26 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: FTR: You're trying to force retro fit literalism onto a general rule regarding truth.
To use your reasoning, a lie that leads to good or bad is always bad.
Yours is a bastardisation of meaning rather than an understanding.
How about instead of me apparently stabbing in the dark here, why don't you explain exactly how this all plays out? How does DCT fit in with a moral code that seems to be grounded in what you think is right in e.g. the OP situation?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
