(April 4, 2013 at 7:05 pm)Mr Infidel Wrote: No, but there is a theistic delusion of there being evidence.
That’s very interesting; scripture says that you have an atheistic delusion that there is no evidence. How do you know you’re right and it’s not right?
(April 4, 2013 at 7:06 pm)Rhythm Wrote: LOL, no, just mentioning that you used to be very fond of claiming that there was - which is what I found odd about your statement. Have you suffered a change of faith? Bowing before a different brand?
No change of heart, the evidence for God’s existence is overwhelming. I am just sophisticated enough to realize that evidence by itself is worthless; it requires a conceptual scheme in order to be interpreted. I also know that the naturalist has begun with a conceptual scheme that rules out all evidence for God’s existence a priori; so it’s absurd for an atheist to be asking for evidence that proves God exists because he’s or she’s already ruled the possibility of it out. Rather than tossing loads of evidence onto the table that both sides interpret completely differently, it’s better to point to whose conceptual scheme is even logically defensible, consistent, and coherent- and the anti-Christian one is certainly not.
