jstrodel Wrote:If you can't see the difference between providing a piece of evidence and making a formal argument, you are brainwashed by psuedo-intellectual atheist propaganda.
Quite. The difference is obvious.
"Piece of evidence" is what we demand, "formal argument" is all you give us.
The difference is that formal arguments don't prove shit. Even if you weren't heinously guilty of seeding your formal arguments with assumptions you erroneously call 'knowledge', you can't prove the existence of your specific God with logical or philosophical prestidigitation any more than you could pound a hammer with it. You demand we take your personal testimony as valid without ever providing a single good reason to do so. In spite of neuroscience obviously not being your field of study, you presume to know that the neurological glitch(es) you've suffered is without question, the will of the Christian God being conveyed directly to you and nobody else telepathically. You go from erudite ideologue to raving lunatic without warning or pause.
