Why Richard Dawkins should debate Christians

[smax]

This is just nonsense. non-sequiters, irrelavnt conclusions, assumptions, no critical examination of what I'm saying and pointless babble about my username?

Not a big fan of your own medicine, eh?

Your repeated attempts to derail the debate into irrelevance rather than deal with the points I'm raising is not interesting or engaging for me so I'm out.

You think it's me who's minimized the subject matter? LOL.

This, coming from the same guy who immediately got lost in semantics instead of focusing the discussion on the obvious point I was making?

I'm not a fatalist. If you are interested in my philosophy I would say it is probably best defined by my strong opposition to Meliorism, humanism and neoliberalism.

Why am I not surprised that your views are not really views at all, but rather non-commital opposition to other views.

I know, I know, you are far too clever to subscribe to anything anyone else may have come up with.

There's nothing worse than someone who doesn't know where they stand but still has the nerve to criticize others for their views.

Oh, and one other thing, thanks for quitting again. This time I'm 100 percent behind you.