When do we cross the line from 'animal' to 'person?'

[Esquilax]

Actually what you brought refutes (non-intelligent) evolution!!!

Tell you how...................

Salmon or Eels find their ways back to the same pond they were born, across seas even sometimes wet land or mud

The method is not important but what is important is the data!
The data of the position must come from an outside source, it cannot come from inside the animal

Uh, yeah. But that's not god; as usual, there's a perfectly rational explanation. It's magnetic fields in this case, most likely. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/0...ic-salmon/

That is a big difference between human and animals
God guides animals by supplying them with this information
on the other hand humans need to learn from (other humans)

Oh look, a baseless assertion. Would you care to support this with literally anything, or should we all just take you at your word?

A non-intelligent evolution (if it ever happened) is impossible because those data need an external intelligent source (God) to feed them into the animal system/brain to utilize.

Or just magnetic fields and odors. Did you even look for an alternative solution before declaring yours to be perfect by fiat?