Why Richard Dawkins should debate Christians

[Cinjin]

What point have I side stepped? Please be specific so I can directly address it. I still don’t see how that justifies you ignoring my points though, especially after you made such a bold claim as “science has disproven all of the proofs for God’s existence”, which of course is a claim that I am very interested in seeing you demonstrate. Science disproving deductive proofs is itself a rather magnificent claim. I am becoming a bit suspicious that you have realized that now and that is the real reason for you ignoring my points, you realized you “made a boo-boo”.

It's not a magnificent claim at all. It's a really simple premise the way I understand the meaning.
I'll give you a few 'for instances' :

That rainbow is beautiful - many would consider that "proof" of god.
That volcano erupted and destroyed that wicked city ... "proof" of god.
The ocean tides rise and fall like clockwork. We later discovered the moon takes the credit ... "proof" of god.


I could go on and on Stat. What she said is a true statement when you realize any tangible "proof" that you christards offer up as evidence has been proven not so by science. Furthermore, stop being such a dick. There's no proof your god exists, let it the fuck go already. You can't just believe and let it be can you ... you have to come here and be a prick to everyone.