creationist tried to tell me embrology doesn't support evolution.

[downbeatplumb]

If there was a period of accelerated decay in the Earth’s history all isotopes would have gone through the same period of synchronized accelerated decay and therefore would yield similar but erroneous ages; so for the third time, how do you know that the rate of decay has been uniform throughout Earth’s history?

See how you need to make up unsupported hypothesis to try and justify your position.

And you wonder why we don't take you seriously.

No I don’t wonder about it at all, I would not expect irrational people to take a rational person seriously.

Pot, Kettle, Black,

Your style is to say "what if" and posit any claim unsupported by evidence you like to try and counter reality.

No, my style is to submit fallible sources to the authority of an infallible source, which is completely logical. You’re trying to prove the infallible source is untrue by pointing to fallible sources which is completely backwards and irrational.

You haven't even proved that the supposed infallible source even exists!
You make the most ludicrous claims backed by nothing and then say we are illogical because we saw the man behind the curtain.

But as all the actual real evidence supports what I said, your childish posturing just makes you look like a moron.

What’s the difference between real evidence and fake evidence?

Real evidence can be shown to be reliable by supporting facts, good documentation, peer review, repeatability. You know good science.

Personally attacking me doesn’t support your position any and only makes you look even more irrational, so by all means please continue doing it.

I wasn't attacking you, I was just pointing something out.

You have nothing to add to the debate other than the made up.

You talk a good game, but unfortunately that’s all it is…talk.

Right back at ya.