I'm happy to see that this thread has sparked so much conversation. For the record, I'm a convert from fundamentalist, generic, American, non-denominational Christianity. As such, the arguments I make against any god will be rooted in the understanding I have of this religion, so when I say, "God," I mean that of the Bible.
Even so, I consider my objection based on lack of personally convincing evidence to be proof that if there is a deity, it is either not a loving one or a loving one that is not all-powerful. It's an argument against the Abrahamic God.
When I say, "supernatural," I suppose I'm referring to ghosts, spirits, or any kind of non-corporeal consciousness that we've heard of through legend. For example, I could conceive that you could construct convincing evidence that the djinn of Islam exist. I don't know what it would be though.
Even so, I consider my objection based on lack of personally convincing evidence to be proof that if there is a deity, it is either not a loving one or a loving one that is not all-powerful. It's an argument against the Abrahamic God.
When I say, "supernatural," I suppose I'm referring to ghosts, spirits, or any kind of non-corporeal consciousness that we've heard of through legend. For example, I could conceive that you could construct convincing evidence that the djinn of Islam exist. I don't know what it would be though.
