(May 15, 2013 at 12:42 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:But you're not responding to any of the inferences you made in your original point.(May 15, 2013 at 12:38 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Temper temper, child.Read properly you prick. I didn't imply that no Muslim drinks or any of the bullshit you grabbed out of your arse. Didn't your mother teach you how to read or is she as illiterate as you?
What you indicated that was that muslims "don't do x" because they would then contravene some god's divine legilsation and legislative plan, inferring that they would thus be living contrary to said god's law and thus not behaving in the way a Muslim would/should.
Now, are we able to have a nice conversation or are we going to have to sit you on the naughty step and send you to bed without dinner?
Instead you're acting like a wickle ickle boy (or girl).
But thanks for taking time out to respond so coherently and in such depth that your natural intellect shines through. If you had indeed made a point worth responding to, it has since been eloquently dealt with by yourself through the manner of reply that you no doubt have become accustomed to utilising in dealing with inconvenient questions/issues with the the posts that write.
Good show, child. I haven't been called a prick in over a decade, well, except by really bad ass BMW M3 drivers who like to cut people up on the motorway without indicating. But please don't read any inference into that; I have no doubt you're not old enough to drive.