(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Hello again,Wrong again. "Equal marriage" currently only refers to same-sex marriage.
No, you’re the liar. You’re confusing same-sex marriage with equal marriage. Equal marriage means any two consenting adults can marry including mother-son or father-adopted daughter etc. The majority of Brits find that unacceptable.
(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: You’re correct. Traditionally in the United States, the arguments opposing interracial marriage have been identical to the current arguments opposing same-sex marriage. But this does not mean a line should be drawn somewhere. It is my opinion that this line must be drawn as it currently stands.And you literally don't see what's wrong with that? You think it's perfectly fine to discriminate against people based on sexual orientation? Really?
(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Because it can. Forcing religious institutions to conduct same-sex marriage ceremonies is a legal possibility that could be enacted as a direct result of the passing of the same-sex marriage bill.So? You know what's much more likely? Nothing of the sort will happen. All they want is the right to marry the person they love. The location isn't the issue. There will be Churches offering wedding ceremonies to same-sex couples under the current plans. The only reason people may fight this imaginary battle of yours is if certain people get their way and the plans change to prohibit Churches from performing same sex marriages. If that happens, it'll be the Churches kicking off first.
It's fucking appalling that I could meet a man today and marry him in a fortnight whether I gave a shit about him or not, but if I had been with a woman for 10 years and loved her to death I wouldn't be allowed to marry her just because of a bunch of outdated homophobic laws which have no place in this century. It's fucking ridiculous.
(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: So do peadophiles and mothers and sons. Paying taxes isn’t a criteria for legally judging who can or cannot marry. And speaking of taxes, the tax system underpins how an unequal and unfair secular democratic society can function; the best we can hope for.Paedophiles have broken the law when they start a sexual relationship with a child. So has a mother if she shags her son. Not the same thing. They're not even the same as each other. Incest is a victimless crime, paedophilia isn't.
(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: It’s not very difficult to make cheap insults at your private part as well you know http://www.healthdailies.com/womens-well...n-periods/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaginal_flatulenceWhich of those was meant to be an insult?
(May 18, 2013 at 11:04 am)ideologue08 Wrote: There’s still more signatories against than for gay marriage, I think you can find the names on the website.So? They're not even sincere.