It's a good emotive argument, but it does a disservice to the injustice of racial segregation (and to the homosexuals who face(d) true oppression). This is even highlighted in your picture, where the whites had the nice clean tidy sink and the blacks the dirty one in the corner. The important part of the picture isn't that they are labelled differently, but that they are actually treated differently. A more accurate representation of civil partnerships would be to have both labels over the nice clean tidy sink.
My argument basically says every "joining of people" should be treated the same, like any other contract, and any label and ceremony attached to that is left to the people involved to decide. The government should have no role in recognising (or not) marriage. If you can show me why this would be a bad idea I'm all ears.
My argument basically says every "joining of people" should be treated the same, like any other contract, and any label and ceremony attached to that is left to the people involved to decide. The government should have no role in recognising (or not) marriage. If you can show me why this would be a bad idea I'm all ears.
