Is it normal to destroy people who get in your way in life?

[dazzn]

most people in our generation believe in transient morals, unlike those 100 or ago.

Ah. I guess. Morality is subjective, because every person has a different idea of what an ideal world is, and their morals will reflect whatever that ideal world is. It's so simple, so I don't understand why people still think whatever they feel is right/wrong is the same for everyone else. You hear people always talking about how "it's the moral thing to do" as if morality is objective. lel.

So you can kill, rape, whatever, and it's not necessarily immoral. You have the right to do those things if you please. But just as you did whatever you wanted to someone else in those actions, there exist people within the society (government) that will do whatever they want to you, which is put you in jail, and they have the right to do that. It's just a matter of who has more power.

So if transient morals exist, what's the issue?

---

and? society says that anything goes, does it not?

No, it certainly does not. Society says it will lock your ass up for the shit you suggest. Your only decision, so long as you're playing sociopath's advocate, is whether the penalty is sufficient to keep you in check.

You sure ask a lot of weird ass questions. Very much like a theist impersonating an atheist might ask just to show how absurd he finds our point of view. You just don't understand how varied our points of view are and just how absurd your attempts at caricature truly seem to us. Troll.

So you dispute that contemporary cites morals as subjective?

---

Say, you haven't thought through much of the utter bollocks you post, have you?

Are morals subjective or not?