proof of end times?

[Tiberius]

There are several verses in the New Testament where is shows that Jesus healed amputees. Jesus healed the lame so they could walk again, and he also healed an amputated ear. Jesus created an entire human body from dust. I'm sure making an amputated limb reappear would be no trouble.

The problem you have there is that we have no external sources to back up the claims of the New Testament. There are no historical references to Jesus doing anything spectacular other than the ones in the Bible.

I wouldn't call it "agnostic." However, I do believe Yahweh is the only true God. But can I prove it? No. I can't.

I've bolded the bit that is important. That question and answer are the exact definition of agnosticism.

I'm not sure if Thor commanded people to a place called 'eternal damnation" if they didn't worship him. I believe Islam and Christianity are the only two monotheistic religions that give a detailed account of the afterlife. Heaven or Hell.

Most religions have a concept of Heaven and Hell, or at least some forms of punishment. Both Romans and Greeks had several variants.

Not really because the theist have chosen to worship a God. Where the atheists have erased God completely. It's like the lottery.. you have to play to win.

That's not the point at all. The point is that there are multiple lotteries, in which we both are not playing. Thus we are all taking "risks".

I believe God exists, and his Omniscient Mind is aware of that. If I look into the Heavens and say, "God, if you are listening, I want you to answer my prayer." Now, by saying that, does that mean I put my faith in question? Answer, Not really.

I never said you were. My point is that Pascal's wager assumes that the God is an ignorant fool who likes people who lie about believing in it. Even if I found Pascals wager to be a good reason to believe, I couldn't just start believing. I'd have to have the evidence before I did that.

It's perfectly normal to have an opinion on a book, but to say it's "bullshit" doesn't actually benefit your arguement.

I'm assuming you have thoroughly studied ancient Hebrew and Greek to come to that conclusion?

It doesn't benefit the argument, but it puts your opinion across (which is what debates are for). And no, I did not study ancient Hebrew, or Greek. I read the Bible.