(June 21, 2013 at 2:41 am)Ryantology Wrote: I can't seem to get a straight answer and I don't want to derail more threads, so:After having been made to watch all of them for a few hours.
1: Under which circumstances, precisely, would you consider it acceptable to carry out the violent mass killing of every infant and child in a city?
Quote:2: Is it just to kill a person because they live in the same place as a person who committed a sin, if they had no direct or conscious involvement in it?We are all guilty of one sin or another, and even the smallest sin requires death. Thankfully Christ died for those sins so we do not have to.
Quote:3: If we are judged guilty, and can be punished for our sins even before we commit them, how is this consistent with the notion of free will being the choice between God and sin?Free will comes in the way of being able to select the attonement offered by Christ. For your right in that we have no choice but to sin. The choice is in desision to seek forgiveness for said sin.
Quote:4: If there is any possible alternative to purposefully killing a person in order to achieve whatever imaginable end may involve doing so, in other words, if you can do what you need to do just as easily regardless of whether or not you kill that person, is it just to kill them anyway?Why are we killing people to begin with? If out of anger and frustration of having been to watch every inner city kid in a given area, then know logic and reason are not in the mix any longer.
