By this you mean how much of the Bible narrarates historic events. I am no creationist, and I feel that the legends of the patriarchs could have real foundations. The events of the Exodus are shady, but from there, I believe things become more and more factual.
Note that events become more and more obscure as we go lower in rank and farther into the past. No historian believes Abraham existed, but he was a nomad that had his story written down hundreds of years after his death. The Bible being ordered in myth, legend, and fact does not detract from its authority as God's Word or its moral wealth.
Note that events become more and more obscure as we go lower in rank and farther into the past. No historian believes Abraham existed, but he was a nomad that had his story written down hundreds of years after his death. The Bible being ordered in myth, legend, and fact does not detract from its authority as God's Word or its moral wealth.
