RE: The End Game of Atheism
June 26, 2013 at 11:24 am
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2013 at 11:26 am by pineapplebunnybounce.)
(June 26, 2013 at 11:18 am)ShadowWolf1986 Wrote:(June 26, 2013 at 11:10 am)max-greece Wrote: Hardly - Mao was a virtual Godhead of the state with every citizen expected to have his little red book with them at all times.
Mao was a man, not a god. Worshiping him as a god does not negate the fact that the Communist government of China was/is Atheistic.
Jesus was a man (if he even was that), not a god. Worshipping him as a god does not negate the fact that Christians are Atheistic. Yes you read that right, Atheist with a capital A.
Quote:Mister Agenda Wrote:I've responded to this, which you've promptly ignored.
Regarding the evolution question, here is the full definition referred to:
ev·o·lu·tion
/ˌevəˈlo͞oSHən/Noun
1.The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the...
2.The gradual development of something, esp. from a simple to a more complex form.
Meaning two is not talking about biological evolution only, it is merely talking about change, and is the sense one would be using if talking about 'the evolution of the modern automobile', for instance. In biological evolution, it is not that unusual to evolve to a simpler form, as is often the case with parasites.
The second definition talks about the development of something from a simple to complex form. According to evolutionists, we evolved from much simpler forms and continue to development into more and more complex forms. Why wouldn't we eventually evolve into transcended godlike beings then?