(June 21, 2013 at 2:41 am)Ryantology Wrote: I can't seem to get a straight answer and I don't want to derail more threads, so:
1: Under which circumstances, precisely, would you consider it acceptable to carry out the violent mass killing of every infant and child in a city?
2: Is it just to kill a person because they live in the same place as a person who committed a sin, if they had no direct or conscious involvement in it?
3: If we are judged guilty, and can be punished for our sins even before we commit them, how is this consistent with the notion of free will being the choice between God and sin?
4: If there is any possible alternative to purposefully killing a person in order to achieve whatever imaginable end may involve doing so, in other words, if you can do what you need to do just as easily regardless of whether or not you kill that person, is it just to kill them anyway?
Late to the game here but.... "Man was made in God's own image."
Next question(s).
Quis ut Deus?