(July 10, 2013 at 11:34 pm)Godschild Wrote:(July 10, 2013 at 6:22 pm)Rationalman Wrote: How can information on evolution be biased? Its not open to different interpretations, its just cold hard facts.
Bull evolutionary scientist do not agree on all of the aspects of evolution.
(July 10, 2013 at 6:26 pm)Dionysius Wrote: I doubt you'd even recognize Jesus if he knocked on your door one day selling life insurance. Jesus was a heretic and his own people didn't understand what he was trying to say because they were a little slow on the uptake - i.e. ugh, sun...make plant grow....water come down... to drink. Fire....make babies taste goooooooddddd.
I see when you get excited you have a stuttering problem, sorry to see that, maybe you could sing your statements when you are excited.
(July 10, 2013 at 7:33 pm)viocjit Wrote: For those who read the Gospels.
If you know a little the talmud (Hebrew : תלמוד [Means : Learning or Instruction]). You can see that if Jesus really did existed and that the gospels contain the real teaching of Jesus , he spoke with a talmudic language.
Example the parable with the mote and the beam (Matthew 7:3-5 and Luke 6:41-42).
Source who prove that this parable is in the talmud :
1.The Mote and the Beam , George B. King , The Harvard Theological Review Vol. 17, No. 4 (Oct., 1924)
2.
From this link : http://www.funtrivia.com/en/subtopics/Ta...11155.html
3.See by yourself in the talmud.
Conclusion : Therefore if the Jesus in the gospels is the historical Jesus he said things who are not in the scriptures.
The two best modern day translations use the word log. Your using an old English translation and a translation that relied on that old English translation.
I don't know a translation who change the meaning of the words for these verses.
Yes I use an old translation (KJV) but we don't care about the words only the meaning of these words are essential.
Also these passages from talmud are only a translation because it was wrote in Hebrew.
Which are the best translations in modern language for you ?