(July 22, 2013 at 6:00 am)Rationalman Wrote: I don't even know where to start on this. All I can say is i don't think you understand what he was getting at. He wasn't saying we would be better without a windpipe or whatever. He was saying it is not intelligently designed because we choke a lot. If we were intelligently designed, we would use different holes for breathing and eating, this would prevent people choking. I suggest next time you type something, YOU should think for a moment, that might help.
The thought process was just fine, it's your's like his that's flawed, without that little nasal passage the negatives I pointed out would be true, why, because there would be two different passages and we could not survive. Oh yeah, if you keep your mouth closed you do breath and eat with two different holes.
I know why you do not know where to start, because you have no argument against what was said.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
