Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 29, 2026, 4:26 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc?
#32
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc?
Is pressure release a parsimonious explanation for why there is more CO2 above a glass of champagne? It involves a vast number of redundant bubbles.

At its most basic, multiverse isn't the addition of an unnecessary assumption. Rather it is the subtraction of an unsupported, albeit as yet in falsified, assumption. Unique Universe asserts for some reason what we see for which we know of no cause is the only way things can be, and there is special cobstraints, as yet unknown, that prevented physical constants from being anything else. Multiverse does not assert that our universe is the only one, or that our physical constants are as the only way they could be. The most basic version of multiverse hypothesis simply allows these two dubious constraints to be removed and see what follows.

Multiverse could be thought of as the most parsimonious interpretation of reality possible based on what is really known of how the laws of physics work at its most basic level.

Unique universe view actually requires certain assumption which follows from no known first principle, and more overarching than could feasibly be verified by observation, to be taken for granted.

Multiverse theory on the other hand, removes these assumptions.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 26, 2013 at 9:21 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 26, 2013 at 11:45 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 31, 2013 at 1:50 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by Chas - July 26, 2013 at 10:04 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by Chas - July 26, 2013 at 6:12 pm
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by Anomalocaris - July 26, 2013 at 6:15 pm
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - August 4, 2013 at 6:12 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Isn’t pantheism the same thing as atheism? Ferrocyanide 177 45062 January 1, 2022 at 2:36 am
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 16444 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  How to destroy any argument for God Drich 46 13403 October 9, 2019 at 9:02 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  How To Support Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 0 967 August 26, 2019 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How To Easily Defend Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 5 1931 August 22, 2019 at 9:13 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Every Apologetic Argument Ever YahwehIsTheWay 21 6508 December 1, 2018 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: T0 Th3 M4X
  Argument from pompousness? Fake Messiah 8 2224 September 1, 2018 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The witness argument (yet again, I know, I know) Mystic 81 29153 August 19, 2018 at 10:43 am
Last Post: Jackie
  Being Catholic isn't an ethnic thing. Joods 0 1338 March 12, 2018 at 8:36 am
Last Post: Joods
  Very short argument for God (another clear proof) Mystic 123 47276 January 26, 2018 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Succubus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)