(January 10, 2010 at 10:55 am)tackattack Wrote: Above supporting my statement that all atheists want to do is pick apart an argument cover it in every, smarmy comment, historically fallacious argumentative data, pages of historic "evidence" until the idea gets so chopped up and reconstituted it's unrecognizable.
No I said "I can't even be an expert in my own opinion because God is an Argument From Authority."
The authority referenced is God's revelations to me personally reflecting in my intuition and personal opinion and not the bible.
I will admit that God's imaginary the second atheists admit God exists. No qualifiers, no double-entendre, no excess wording, simple.
Well of course we pick apart arguments, what did you expect? we're atheists and therefore sceptics.
And if your argument can't withstand scrutiny and examination then it's not much of an argument.
"historically fallacious argumentative data" in what way is it fallacious???
Because it disagrees with the Bible??
And I have to ask, how did God communicate his revelations personally to you?
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.