(January 5, 2010 at 10:22 am)scientist Wrote: I've been in major debates against atheists and time and time again, the fundamental flaws of atheism lead to their consistent defeat. This is expected because atheism's flaws are basic, fundamental in nature and cannot stand against good theist attacks.
Isn't that strange, because the only way your sentence can make sense is to reverse the words atheist, atheism and theist.
Doesn't this make far more sense..
Quote:I've been in major debates against theists and time and time again, the fundamental flaws of theism lead to their consistent defeat. This is expected because theism's flaws are basic, fundamental in nature and cannot stand against good atheist attacks.
![[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=oggtheclever.com%2Fcinjin_banner_border.jpg)