RE: The original Christianity is not what is in the Bible
September 5, 2013 at 7:01 pm
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2013 at 7:01 pm by Bad Writer.)
(September 5, 2013 at 6:46 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 5, 2013 at 6:12 pm)Minimalist Wrote: In Drippy's case he won't even consider the alternative to his ecclesiastical bullshit.Is this what the great minnie is reduced down to when his arguements fail because he can not support them when asked to provide 'proof?'
He seems to forget that we have the decrees of the Roman Emperors as they cracked down on pagan and heretical xtian groups. His early xtian heroes had no sense of shame about these documents and so preserved them for posterity.
Now, we get sanctimonious little shits like Drippy and G-C who are embarrassed by the implications of them so any scholar who reads them and comments on them must be a "tool of the devil."
Sorry, Drip. You are a tool and a fool.
Name calling? Really? is that your big finish? You called me a tool and a fool. I bet if you thought about it you could have worked in uncool, that rhymes, what about jewl, or Zuhl (The main bad guy from the first Ghost busters.) You could have said I was being stubborn like a mule maybe..
He actually backed it up by pointing out how you don't consider the alternative, but you let your emotions get in the way of that by focusing on the ad Homs. Why don't you finish your "what ifs" with "and if nots"?
![[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]](https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/t1.0-9/10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg)