The only way i can think to deal with this is to consider the opposite.
An objective truth requires no physical evidence to support it.
The two statements are mutually exclusive, so which would you pick as true.
And rjh4 is still to defend his assertation of the bible being an objective proof.
An objective truth requires no physical evidence to support it.
The two statements are mutually exclusive, so which would you pick as true.
And rjh4 is still to defend his assertation of the bible being an objective proof.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.